Erroneous Summary Concludes Barry Young’s Brief Of Evidence

Barry Young’s Knowledge & belief ignored the truth of the matter

Erroneous Summary Concludes Barry Young’s Brief Of Evidence
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess
There was no attempt through-out the whole document to establish the facts of the incident created by M Pigneguy.
Barry Young’s summary at the conclusion of his Brief of Evidence appears to be written solely as a Hired Gun to ensure Maritime New Zealand can hoodwink a nautically unknowledgeable District Court Judge Davis into prosecuting the wrong skipper.
A deviant Summary according to Barry Young
“I note that any suggestion that this incident could have been avoided by Seaway altering course to port would not comply with the Maritime rules. Part 22.17.2.b. specifically states that the stand-on vessel, in this case Seaway, must not alter course to port for a vessel on its own port side.”
1: Barry Young ignores all evidence that M Pigneguy as relieving master of Seaway steered to starboard in violation of Rule 22.17.1. & encroached on the path of Classique – therefore Seaway was obliged to turn away from Classique & consequently to port to rectify the error of not having kept to an earlier course.
2: Barry Young erroneously classifies Seaway as a stand-on vessel.
M Pigneguy was not entitled by his own negligent steering towards Classique to then invoke the crossing rule when Seaway was not a stand-on vessel as long as it remained on its earlier course.
3: In which case Rule 22.17.2.b. quoted unprofessionally by Barry Young does not apply – Seaway was entirely free to turn to port not only to remedy going off course towards the path of Classique but also as a ferry on a Regular Run it was entitled to turn to port after it passed Browns Island enroute Auckland.
4: Barry Young declared his Brief of Evidence to be true to the best of his knowledge & belief.
5: His knowledge is demonstrably lacking & his beliefs are nefariously distorted to suit his capacity as a Hired gun to assist Maritime New Zealand rather than the Court. Truth is absent.
6: In the process Barry Young disregards his sworn Code of Conduct & violates his role as an Expert Witness in order to have the wrong skipper convicted.
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

         Barry Young’s Knowledge & belief ignored the truth of the matter
Erroneous Summary Concludes Barry Young’s Brief Of Evidence,KnowledgeBeliefIncident

 

Erroneous Summary Concludes Barry Young’s Brief Of Evidence

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge