Judge Davis Mislead by Barry Young re Bolton’s Evidence

Used as A Missile guidance system to avoid collisions based on how the Line of Sight bearing changes or not.

Judge Davis Mislead by Barry Young re Bolton’s Evidence
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess
Little does Judge Davis know how badly he was let down by Barry Young who was there as a purported Expert Witness expected to be a help to the Court but Barry Young acted either ignorantly or purposely as a Hired Gun employed by Maritime New Zealand to pervert the course of Justice.
Judge Davis writes inaccurately in his Decision –
“Mr Bolton in support of his defence raised a number of matters. The most significant of those is that he uses to navigate an infallible rule of thumb as he describes it, by which he holds his thumb up against a marker on Classique & projects a transit line onto the background to determine if a crossing situation exists or not. In cross-examination the method of determining whether a crossing situation existed was put to the independent Maritime expert Mr Young who did not accept Mr Bolton’s method of navigation as being appropriate. Mr Young indicated it was not taught in any Maritime schools that he was aware of.”
Here is another example where Judge Davis hasn’t understood Bolton’s evidence put before him & Barry Young wrongfully denies that Bolton’s method is correct. Barry Young is not competent to be in Court as a witness purported to be expert – he is not independent for one thing & for another, he doesn’t seem know his navigational material.
1: Judge Davis was not told that Bolton holds his thumb up against anything – in fact he was told a thumb was not involved at all.
2: Bolton assumed those in Court were of sufficient intelligence to know that a rule of thumb is – “a general principle, procedure, or rule based on experience or practice”
3: The way Judge Davis describes Bolton’s Line Of sight method has been confused with the way M Pigneguy & Barry Young described the way they take their unreliable Relative Bearing – definitely not recommended & yet championed by Barry Young who should’ve known that M Pigneguy invalidated it by not holding a steady course.
4: Barry Young is obviously not aware of fundamental navigational practices. This method is taught in the Maritime School he said he was a tutor at – it is verified by Julian Joy, ex senior instructor there.
5: Furthermore this principle was subject of a post here 26 Oct’14
“Proportional navigation = Line of Sight.”
6: The basis of proportional navigation was first discovered at sea, and was used by navigators on ships to avoid collisions. A Missile guidance system to avoid collisions based on how the Line of Sight bearing changes or not. An alternative name for the technique is Constant Bearing Decreasing Range.
7: Bolton’s line of sight method is so accurate, it can be described as infallible – in fact it is superior to use of a compass in many situations including where either a compass is not available or in situations where one could not be used – bad seas, multiple simultaneous targets etc.
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

Used as A Missile guidance system to avoid collisions based on how the Line of Sight bearing changes or not.
Judge Davis Mislead by Barry Young re Bolton’s Evidence,2014-02-02_1729

 

Judge Davis Mislead by Barry Young re Bolton’s Evidence

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge