The Incident Report Filed By M Pigneguy Is Unfeasible

Hooter & Camera as used by M Pigneguy, are no substitute for a decent Ship’s Whistle which was not functioning on Seaway

The Incident Report Filed By M Pigneguy Is Unfeasible
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess
The Report filed by M Pigneguy is obviously unfeasible.
It is regarding the incident he purposely or inadvertently created with Seaway to implicate Classique in a purported close quarters.
“When the yacht was aprox 80mtrs away, 5 blasts were sounded on the ship’s whistle. This drew no response even when a further 5 blasts were sounded by which point collision was imminent &
he took evasive action by slowing the ferry right down to allow the yacht to pass across its bow”
Analysis of a fabricated claim …
1: The ferry was travelling at 15.5 kts & would cover the distance of 80 mtrs in 10 seconds. Each blast is to be about 1 second’s duration (Rule 22.32) so 2 series of 5 blasts would take 10 seconds without the interval for response in between – that’s over time already.
2: Furthermore M Pigneguy had no ship’s whistle to use – it was out of order so he was using an inadequate & non complying hand held aerosol can with a hooter suitable for dinghies or small runabouts, so it would not be heard in the wheelhouse of Classique as required by Maritime Rules.
3: The ferry weighs 281 gross tons & has total engine power of 1120 Kw – it would certainly not be possible to slow Seaway when time had already run out. In fact on the Day, Bolton observed Seaway pass astern of Classique without any alteration of speed. It was travelling as fast as a ro/ro ferry would be expected to travel.
4: Neither did M Pigneguy sound the obligatory 3 blasts to indicate he was putting Seaway into astern propulsion. That was another violation in addition to taking all his imaginary actions at such a stupidly inappropriate stage, instead of in ample time as required by Maritime Rules created with the aim of preventing such a situation as M Pigneguy described in his implausible report.
5: Maritime New Zealand, its hired gun Barry Young & Mark Davies, Crown Law, Meredith Connell deliberately ignored the ridiculously impossible claim made by M Pigneguy even though it was brought to their attention at the outset & continuously prior to the hearing before a nautically unknowledgeable Judge Davis in a District Court instead of the TAIC – Transport Accident Investigation Commission which Maritime New Zealand failed to notify as they were legally require to for the benefit of all mariners especially in this case where Ferries have Regular runs.
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

Hooter & Camera as used by M Pigneguy, are no substitute for a decent Ship’s Whistle
which was not functioning on Seaway
The Incident Report Filed By M Pigneguy Is Unfeasible

The Incident Report Filed By M Pigneguy Is Unfeasible

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge