Judge Davis Ignores M Pigneguy Prevaricating about Distances

Comparison with Photos taken at verified 80 & 1000 mtrs show discrepancy in Photo 1 clearance

Judge Davis Ignores M Pignguy Prevaricating about Distances
Submissions for Appeal on Judge Davis’s Decision
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess
The following are the Appellant’s (Bolton’s) responses to Paragraphs 35 & 36
[25] Para 35 & 36 : His Honour likewise, misunderstands photographic evidence The photos taken of Classique at 80 & 1000 mtrs by the Appellant (Bolton) and Classique’s crew were necessitated when we read in Capt Pigneyguy’s evidence before the trial that his “1st photo was at 1st horn blast” & “2nd Photo was at 2nd blast”
(a) In Capt Pigneyguy’s original Incident report he had stated his 1st series of blasts were at 80 mtrs but had not stated the distance at which the 1st photo had been taken – consequently MNZ, Barry Young & myself had all worked out it was at about 1000 mtrs & this was confirmed when Capt Pigneyguy stated in cross-examination Page 30 line 31 & 32 “It’s probably more like half a nautical mile” (I nmile = 1850 mtrs) distance away at the 1st photo. Further confusing in cross-examination Page 22 lines32-34, he says that the 1st blasts could’ve been at the taking of the 2nd photo.
(b) Consequently it should have been helpful to the Court to have the accuracy of distances verifiable – the mast height of Classique (15mm) in the 1st photo taken by the ferry is equal to the mast of Classique in the one taken by myself at 1000mtrs but in the photo of Classique taken at 80 mtrs the mast height is 1cm greater than the 3rd photo taken by the ferry indicating Classique was further away than 80 mtrs in that zoomed photo which was difficult to gauge, hence the various estimates from 20 to 50, at least 2 boat lengths or 80 mtrs. (Refer SD [16] attachment 7)
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

80 mtrs compared – Photo 3 taken by M Pigneguy said to be less than 80 mtrs
when it could conceivably further away than that.
Judge Davis Ignores M Pigneguy Prevaricating about Distances

1000 mtrs compared – Photo 1 by M Pigneguy found to be about 1000 mtrs away
practically equals the photo taken at a verified 1000 mtrs by Bolton
Judge Davis Ignores M Pigneguy Prevaricating about Distances

Judge Davis Ignores M Pigneguy Prevaricating about Distances

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge