Crown Law Cooks The Evidence To Mislead Judge Davis re Facts

The evidence is rubbish from Barry Young & those others on Seaway who witnessed the event.

Crown Law Cooks The Evidence To Mislead Judge Davis re Facts

Appellant’s Submissions in response to Submissions of Crown Law Mark Davies, Meredith Connell in opposition to Appeal against Conviction
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess
Crown Law on behalf of Maritime New Zealand wrote in their Submission Paragraph 31
“In addition, in reaching its decision the Court had regard to the expert opinion of Mr Young, to the attempts to recreate the courses after the events and also to the factual evidence from the individuals that witnessed the event.”
The Appellant (Bolton) seeks to respond to the Crown submission …
Response to Paragraph 31
Response 31. Further more, the evidence from individuals that witnessed the event, used by the Judge in reaching his decision, could only have come from M Pigneyguy or Phillip Sweetman, whose alleged facts are being disputed in this Appeal.
======================================================================
Note in addition to Response 31 …
Judge Davis appeared to only have regard to Barry Young’s opinion regarding Bolton’s reconstruction of Seaway’s courses after the event, in reaching its decision. It is farcical for Mark Davies & Maritime New Zealand to call the evidence ‘factual’ as given by M Pigneguy & Phillip Sweetman – they were the only others to have witnessed the event & they were the ones who manufactured the evidence, then colluded to construct what they would prepare as evidence. M Pigneguy several times emphasized in court how he had stopped Seaway even to the extent of being “dead in the water” to let Classique pass ahead of Seaway.
That was impressed upon Judge Davis and had a huge effect of picturing the gravity to be attached to the predicament M Pigneguy falsely claimed.
This was absolutely untrue & how M Pigneguy got away with impunity is disgusting. Seaway never slowed but went past as fast as a roll-on/roll-off ferry would be expected to travel. That is the observation of Bolton & crew on board Classique who also witnessed the event but Judge Davis had no regard for the facts of the case – only the opinion of the Hired Gun Barry Young, employed by Maritime New Zealand.
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

This is where the evidence belongs from Barry Young & those others on Seaway who witnessed the event.
Crown Law Cooks The Evidence To Mislead Judge Davis re Facts

Crown Law Cooks The Evidence To Mislead Judge Davis re Facts

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge