Crown Law, Maritime New Zealand & Barry Young Prevaricate

Barry Young betrays his integrity by denying that it’s possible to determine the position of Seaway in Photo 1

Crown Law, Maritime New Zealand & Barry Young Prevaricate

Appellant’s Submissions in response to Submissions of Crown Law Mark Davies, Meredith Connell in opposition to Appeal against Conviction
Crown Law, Maritime New Zealand & Barry Young Prevaricate
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

Crown Law on behalf of Maritime New Zealand wrote in their Submission, Paragraph 38 …
38:”It is further submitted that it was open to Judge Davis to reject Mr Bolton’s attempts to recreate the course taken by the vessels for precisely the reasons that Mr Young did in evidence, namely that there was only one transit line able to be discerned. In the absence of a second, attempts to recreate the path of the vessels were unhelpful and speculative. The photographs provided the most useful evidence of the situation that developed. Mr Young was cross-examined on this extensively but his evidence remained unchanged.”
The Appellant (Bolton) seeks to respond to the Crown submission …
Responses to Paragraph 38 …
Response 38. B Young was wrong & unhelpful to say
(a) There was no starting point when it is provided by M Pigneyguy in his chart.
(b) That there was only 1 transit line discernible when there were 2 & the existing single transit with a position line was sufficient anyway
(c) That 2 transits are required to recreate the path of the ferry when that is not true.
(d) That the photos were sufficient evidence upon which to determine the situation.
For Barry Young to be obstinate in his belief is a serious matter of Navigational Principle, casting doubt as to his conduct as an Expert witness, thereby necessitating this Appeal.
==================================================================
Note in addition to the above submission –
It is disgustingly dishonest for Crown Law to uphold the perjurious evidence given by Barry Young and Maritime New Zealand, Ian Howden shares that dishonesty.
The photos revealed the atrocities of M Pigneguy to which a blind eye was turned.
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

Barry Young betrays his integrity by denying that it’s possible to determine the position of Seaway in Photo 1
JJoy'sWText

Crown Law, Maritime New Zealand & Barry Young Prevaricate

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge