Skulduggery With TAIC Document In-Time For The Hearing

The fact that there are 2 conflicting documents must raise some real question of MNZ skulduggery

Skulduggery With TAIC Document In-Time For The Hearing
Maritime New Zealand & its witnesses mislead Judge Davis into giving the result they wanted – the wrongful prosecution of Bolton, the innocent skipper of Classique
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess
The Legal Aid Barrister now acting for Bolton applied for a second Rehearing & filed a Supporting Memorandum referring to “evidence in matters that may have resulted in a miscarriage of Justice.”
The Memorandum continues …re the non notification of TAIC – Transport Accident Investigation Commission.
“The fact that there are 2 conflicting documents must raise some real question whether Maritime New Zealand has complied with the Act. Clearly these 2 documents are inconsistent and ought properly to have been explored and can be explored by way of a rehearing.
The second matter Counsel seeks to raise is His Honour’s decision.
His Honour referred to the witnesses for the prosecution did not know either of the “conspirators”. It is respectfully submitted in this respect Your Honour has been mislead of misinformed and again this is a matter that we invite His Honour to give further consideration for in support of an application rehearing. Annexed to this Memorandum is an inside page from Professional Skipper Magazine where both Mr Keith Ingram and Mr Michael Pigneguy both appear, one as an Editor and one as a Contributing author. Plainly they do know each other. Equally in the transcript of evidence Mr Pigneguy confirms at page 26 that he does in fact know Mr Ingram. Michael Pigneguy also at page 27 (line 28) of the transcript confirms he was a former Chairman of the Auckland Charter Boat Association.
We submit that this matter should be further explored by way of a rehearing because the submission of the applicant is that the Prosecution is tainted by the close association of the various actors or participants in this prosecution.” Continues …
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess

 

Two conflicting documents – the later ticked one indicates skulduggery by Crown Law in time for the hearing.
Skullduggery With TAIC Document In-Time For The Hearing

Skulduggery With TAIC Document In-Time For The Hearing

Website Pin Facebook Twitter Myspace Friendfeed Technorati del.icio.us Digg Google StumbleUpon Premium Responsive

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge