The Evidence given by Julian Joy in his Reports endorses 100% that adduced by the Appellant, Bolton
Points on Appeal from the Decision of Judge Toogood
It’s an asininity of the Law that Judge Toogood has to go through this whole rigmarole of protecting the misguided & wrongful Decision of Judge Davis which should not have seen light of day in the first place.
Because of the perjury & perversion of the course of Justice which went on with Maritime New Zealand aided & abetted by Crown Law, the dishonest evidence from witnesses M Pigneguy & Barry Young is given what appears to be an unwarranted status.
It has necessitated the commission of Julian Joy’s 2 Reports which reveal the extent to which Judge Davis was deceived as to the true situation & application of Collision Regulations especially where they apply to areas where Ferries have Regular Runs.
The following are the rebuttals of Paragraphs 4 & 5 from Judge Toogoods, not so good Decision …
1 : Para 4 – The Principle of Freshness applied by Toogood J when considering this application to admit further evidence should not be applicable in this case where as the Principles of Credibility & Leading to a finding of Not Guilty certainly applied.
2 : Para 5 – The necessity for the Reports became evident after the decision of Judge Davis, which revealed that he had been mislead on every Nautical Principle, by the false claims & statements of Barry Young and of M Pigneyguy.
In an affidavit , Julian Joy swore that he is able to establish a professional witness foundation for solid advice to the court, that he was unavailable for the hearing and that Crown Law had prevented his availability.
The Evidence given by Julian Joy in his Reports endorses 100% that adduced by the Appellant, Bolton, at the hearing.
Link for Seeing, Signing & Sharing Petition – http://maritimenz.com/AnnulConvictionGainedByAbuseOfCourtProcess